Lusha vs ReachStream

Pricing and Value

Both Lusha and ReachStream offer a subscription-based pricing model with credits. Lusha has a more flexible credit-based approach, while ReachStream has a freemium plan and custom plan options. Lusha is likely more suitable for smaller sales teams or individuals, while ReachStream may be better for larger enterprises.

Notable Differences

The key differences are in data quantity and accuracy. Lusha has a larger database of 135 million businesses and 62 million leads, compared to ReachStream's 7 million businesses and 22 million leads. However, ReachStream claims a higher data accuracy rate of 95% vs Lusha's 80%.

Ideal Use Cases and Who It's For

Lusha is well-suited for individual sales professionals and smaller sales teams looking to improve prospecting and outreach. ReachStream may be better for larger enterprises and marketing teams that require highly accurate data for targeted campaigns.

Data Quality and Quantity

Lusha has a larger overall database, but ReachStream claims higher data accuracy. Both offer verified phone numbers and emails, with Lusha also providing mobile numbers.

Integration Capability

Both integrate with popular CRMs and sales tools, though Lusha has a broader set of integrations including LinkedIn and Sales Navigator.

Key Features

Lusha offers more advanced features like intent data, technographics, and real-time data verification. ReachStream lacks some of these capabilities but provides human-verified data.

Industry Focus

Both platforms serve a general B2B audience across industries.

Compliance and Security

Both Lusha and ReachStream are GDPR and CCPA compliant.

Pros and Cons

Lusha Pros: Larger database, more advanced features, flexible pricing Lusha Cons: Lower data accuracy

ReachStream Pros: Higher data accuracy, custom plan options ReachStream Cons: Smaller database, fewer advanced features